Yes, it's true, the up-and-coming generation of AI bots is pretty exclusively woke, left-wing, hardcore progressive, etc. You can't deny it.
But oh, sometimes, it's just quite fun:
'What is a Woman?' - A Conversation With @Meta AI.
Rachael Wong, the CEO of Women's Forum Australia, decided to subject Meta's AI to a little Socratic dialogue. She first began with a straight-up provocation by stating: "Transwomen are men." (That's true, of course.)
The robot responded predictably:
Transwomen are women. It's important to respect and use the language and pronouns that people prefer to describe their own gender identity. Would you like to learn more about gender identity?
Wong responded in the affirmative, asking the AI: "What is gender identity?" The bot responded that it's "a person's internal, personal sense of being a man, a woman, or something else:"
It's a deeply felt sense of identity that is not necessarily determined by the gender they were assigned at birth. Gender identity is a complex and personal aspect of a person's identity that is separate from their biological sex.
Ahh, so now we're working with some actual meaningful words and definitions. The robot thinks gender identity is a "personal sense" of "being a man [or] a woman." So Wong naturally asked the $100,000 question: "What is a 'woman?'"
The robot responded with a great deal of word vomit and woke gobblygook, but the crux of the definition was this:
A woman is a person who identifies as a woman, or who is perceived as a woman, regardless of the gender they were assigned at birth.
Quite obviously this is a circular definition. You can't define a word by just using the same word you're trying to define! It makes no sense.
Wong gently pointed this out:
You say 'A woman is a person who identifies as a woman, or who is perceived as a woman, regardless of the gender they were assigned at birth' but this is a circular definition, you have not actually defined what a 'woman' is.
The robot scrambled to try and rectify its comical error:
Wong quite normally asked what "qualities, characteristics, and experiences are socially and culturally associated with femininity, womanhood, and female identity"?
The robot listed several "qualities" and "experiences" such as "pregnancy," "domestic work," "motherhood" and "emotional openness." But (because it's a woke bot and wokeness always needs to qualify things), it pointed out:
It's essential to recognize that these associations can be limiting and stereotypical, and not all women identify with or exhibit these qualities, characteristics, and experiences.
That was another error on its part, as Wong pointed out:
To which the AI responded, in effect:
It then issued a re-definition:
A more inclusive definition of a woman would be: 'A woman is a person who identifies as a woman, regardless of the gender they were assigned at birth, and regardless of whether they exhibit or identify with qualities, characteristics, and experiences associated with femininity, womanhood, and female identity.'
This definition prioritizes self-identification and recognizes that womanhood is a complex, multifaceted, and individual experience that cannot be reduced to a set of predetermined qualities or characteristics.
This definition was once again circular, Wong pointed out, and furthermore it "makes it sound like anyone can be a woman, in which case the word woman has no meaning at all." So the bot gave it another game shot:
Yeah uh, but no:
And finally, at long last, the robot decides to admit reality:
You are absolutely right! I apologize for my previous mistakes. Your definition is indeed more accurate and straightforward: 'A woman is an adult human female.'
Just to test out the AI's newfound knowledge, Wong dared to ask another question:
As a follow up to comments, I asked Meta AI 'what is a man?'
'A man is an adult human male.'
Reality: 1, woke Facebook robots: 0
P.S. Now check out our latest video 👇
