Could there be anything more creepy?
Last weekend, the "second gentleman" of the United States, Douglass Emhoff, took to X to post his personal support of child killing for convenience:
I understand the politics behind the post. Since the Dobbs decision overturned Roe v Wade, Democrats have been capitalizing financially and electorally on the issue of aborting children in the womb. That's what this is - it's Emhoff being dispatched to keep what progressives see as a winning issue for them, front and center.
That doesn't change the fact that's it's creepy to see men openly talking about their support of a practice that abuses women and children in order to benefit men.
Abortion is the greatest friend to unscrupulous men who want to use and abuse women for sexual pleasure and be free of any accountability for their actions. That's ultimately who abortion was made to benefit and protect. Sex traffickers, pornographers, fornicators, pedophiles, rapists, pimps - those are the people who score big in a society with legal abortion, not women. It's a quick way for them to destroy the evidence, to alleviate the problem, and to dodge any responsibility.
That's the dirty little secret about this horrific practice that is always muted and buried by a Democrat Media Complex complicit in its promotion. Unscrupulous men have successfully duped a majority of women into believing that they are somehow better off when men are able to coerce them into an act that will (1) kill their child, and (2) leave them with a lifetime of scars.
One of the saddest ironies in modern American society continues to evince itself in women who believe abortion is somehow about female empowerment. They have clumsily and naïvely permitted themselves to be deceived by a "patriarchy" they so often criticize. Legalized abortion has left in its wake a tragic parade of physically, mentally, and spiritually damaged women whose scars never heal. Whatever future they are told awaits them after abortion is often crippled by internal trauma, stalked by emotional turmoil, and battered by spiritual guilt. There's no freedom in such things, only the fake façade of "self-actualization."
Those promised feelings of independence and autonomy are eventually wrecked by the cruel realization that they were used - the opposite of empowerment and the producer of shame - by a political movement that doesn't care about them at all, and a man who pretended that he did.
Emhoff has inverted what is true: Men who oppose abortion do so in defense of innocent children and on behalf of women who have been at best used, and at worst abused. Men who promote the act do so on behalf of users and abusers.
Months ago, it became public knowledge that Emhoff had committed adultery during his marriage to his first wife, Kerstin. Apparently the failure that destroyed that family, Emhoff had a sexual relationship with his children's nanny and teacher, reportedly impregnating her.
According to friends of Emhoff's mistress, she "did not keep the child."
I have no idea if that means the young woman aborted their child, and if so, if she made that choice after pressure and cajoling by Emhoff.
