There's no way this is a real study. This was a conspiracy theory like five minutes ago.
Bro, this would've gotten me banned from Twitter in 2021 and now, three years after the fact, we're allowed to talk about it.
We truly live in the strangest of times, though keep in mind, this study doesn't outright attribute excess deaths to the vax, it simply gives data suggesting excess deaths were caused by the shot.
Here are the important numbers within this BMJ Public Health study:
In 2020, the year of the COVID-19 pandemic onset and implementation of containment measures, records present 1,033,122 excess deaths (P-score 11.4%). In 2021, the year in which both containment measures and COVID-19 vaccines were used to address virus spread and infection, the highest number of excess deaths was reported: 1,256,942 excess deaths (P-score 13.8%). In 2022, when most containment measures were lifted and COVID-19 vaccines were continued, preliminary data present 808,392 excess deaths (P-score 8.8%).
That's a lot of excess deaths post-vaccine if you ask me. Especially since they were supposed to save lives.
Here's what those excess deaths looked like in graph form:
Notice that little spike in March of 2021 when the general public started getting vaxxed in large numbers, and then the huge spike starting in late summer 2021, when our 70% vaccinated American population (along with the rest of the Western world and their vaccinated populations) started to contract seasonal Covid again. Let's be honest, with that many people being "vaccinated" we really shouldn't have seen such a large spike in excess mortality.
Also in that graph, notice that the linear excess mortality trendline is nearly horizontal. This simply should not be a horizontal line. It should be trending downward (hard) as we rolled out the "vaccine."
Here is the most notable passage from the study (it's a long one so buckle up, you conspiracy theorists, you):
Although COVID-19 vaccines were provided to guard civilians from suffering morbidity and mortality by the COVID-19 virus, suspected adverse events have been documented as well. The secondary analysis of the placebo-controlled, phase III randomised clinical trials of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines showed that the Pfizer trial had a 36% higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group. The risk difference was 18.0 per 10 000 vaccinated (95% CI 1.2 to 34.9), and the risk ratio was 1.36 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.83). The Moderna trial had a 6% higher risk of serious adverse events among vaccine recipients. The risk difference was 7.1 per 10 000 vaccinated (95% CI −23.2 to 37.4), and the risk ratio was 1.06 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.33).
Translation: The vaccines were not as safe as they told you for a virus that was not as dangerous as they told you.
By definition, these serious adverse events lead to either death, are life-threatening, require inpatient (prolongation of) hospitalisation, cause persistent/significant disability/incapacity, concern a congenital anomaly/ birth defect or include a medically important event according to medical judgement. The authors of the secondary analysis point out that most of these serious adverse events concern common clinical conditions, for example, ischaemic stroke, acute coronary syndrome and brain haemorrhage. This commonality hinders clinical suspicion and consequently its detection as adverse vaccine reactions.
Translation: When doctors have a patient who has a stroke, heart attack, hemorrhage, or birth defects, they don't immediately suspect there's any connection to a shot someone received months or years prior, since these are seen commonly. This means medical practitioners don't generally report them as vaccine side effects.
Considering this, what's notable is the sheer number of people who have reported symptoms in vaccine-injury databases.
Both medical professionals and citizens have reported serious injuries and deaths following vaccination to various official databases in the Western World, such as VAERS in the USA, EudraVigilance in the European Union and Yellow Card Scheme in the UK. A study comparing adverse event reports to VAERS and EudraVigilance following mRNA COVID-19 vaccines versus influenza vaccines observed a higher risk of serious adverse reactions for COVID-19 vaccines. These reactions included cardiovascular diseases, coagulation, haemorrhages, gastrointestinal events and thromboses. Numerous studies reported that COVID-19 vaccination may induce myocarditis, pericarditis and autoimmune diseases. Postmortem examinations have also ascribed myocarditis, encephalitis, immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, intracranial haemorrhage and diffuse thrombosis to COVID-19 vaccinations. The Food and Drug Administration noted in July 2021 that the following potentially serious adverse events of Pfizer vaccines deserve further monitoring and investigation: pulmonary embolism, acute myocardial infarction, immune thrombocytopenia and disseminated intravascular coagulation.
Remember, you could be banned from Facebook - and if you were a medical professional, lose your job and be dragged through a media firestorm - if you suggested this all the way up until late 2022.
Websites like ours could not publish information like this to Twitter and Facebook because we would have been banned (and lost most of our traffic/revenue as a result). We tried to warn people that preliminary alarms about the vax should be considered and merited further study/caution, but we were silenced outside our own site.
For example, we published this in 2021, but could not share it.
This current story will still not appear on our Facebook page because their vague guidelines may penalize us for reporting a PEER-REVIEWED STUDY!
Insight into the excess death rates in the years following the declaration of the pandemic by WHO is crucial for government leaders and policymakers to evaluate their health crisis policies.
In conclusion, the researchers had this to say:
[E]xcess mortality has remained high in the Western World for three consecutive years, despite the implementation of COVID-19 containment measures and COVID-19 vaccines. This is unprecedented and raises serious concerns. During the pandemic, it was emphasised by politicians and the media on a daily basis that every COVID-19 death mattered and every life deserved protection through containment measures and COVID-19 vaccines. In the aftermath of the pandemic, the same morale should apply. Every death needs to be acknowledged and accounted for, irrespective of its origin. Transparency towards potential lethal drivers is warranted. Cause-specific mortality data therefore need to be made available to allow more detailed, direct and robust analyses to determine the underlying contribu- tors. Postmortem examinations need to be facilitated to allot the exact reason for death. Government leaders and policymakers need to thoroughly investigate underlying causes of persistent excess mortality and evaluate their health crisis policies.
Man, isn't being a conspiracy theorist great?
P.S. Now check out our latest video 👇
